PUBLISHED OPINIONS
| Opinion | Short Title/District |
|---|---|
| 09a0020p.06 | Geoffrey Fieger v. Michigan Supreme Court Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit |
| 09a0021a.06 | USA v. Bailey Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington |
| 09a0022p.06 | Dennis Pennington v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Stacey Pennington, the 17-year-old daughter of Dennis and Sharon Pennington, was killed in an automobile accident in July 2004. The Penningtons had four drivers in their family, all of whom were insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. In addition to insuring their vehicles, the Penningtons purchased underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage with limits of $100,000 per person/$300,000 per accident (100/300 UIM coverage). UIM coverage provides funds to an insured if the liability insurance held by the person responsible for the accident is insufficient to compensate the insured for injuries incurred. At issue on appeal is whether, under Kentucky law, an insurance company may charge a greater UIM premium based on the number of drivers on a policy without being liable for multiple UIM coverage units (i.e., “stacking”). The district court determined that the Penningtons purchased only one unit of 100/300 UIM coverage for four drivers and were not entitled to stacking. This appeal followed. A few weeks prior to oral argument, the Penningtons filed a motion asking us to certify the legal question at issue to the Kentucky Supreme Court. For the reasons set forth below, we DENY the motion to certify and AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. |
| 09a0023p.06 | Garner v. Cuyahoga Cnty Court Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland |
| 09a0024p.06 | Carter v. Welles-Bowen Realty Northern District of Ohio at Toledo |
| 09a0025p.06 | Barr v. Lafon Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville |
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION OPINIONS
| Opinion | Short Title/District |
|---|---|
| 09a0040n.06 | USA v. Cornelius Easley Western District of Tennessee at Memphis |
| 09a0041n.06 | Cadle Co v. Reiner, Reiner & Bendett Northern District of Ohio at Youngstown |
| 09a0042n.06 | Pepaj v. Mukasey Board of Immigration Appeals |
| 09a0043n.06 | USA v. Robson Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit |
| 09a0044n.06 | USA v. Ashiq Eastern District of Kentucky at London |
| 09a0045n.06 | Artan Prifti v. Michael Mukasey Board of Immigration Appeals |
| 09a0046n.06 | Cynthia Turnage v. Norfolk Southern Corporation Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville |
| 09a0047n.06 | David Myers v. Huron County, Ohio Northern District of Ohio at Toledo |
| 09a0048n.06 | Linda Wolfanger v. Laurel County, Kentucky Eastern District of Kentucky at London |
| 09a0049n.06 | Jones v. Trombley Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit |
| 09a0050n.06 | Giklin Arauz v. Ricky Bell Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville |
| 09a0051n.06 | USA v. Neeley Eastern District of Kentucky at London |
| 09a0052n.06 | USA v. Jesse Stark Western District of Michigan at Marquette |
| 09a0053n.06 | Devereaux v. Mills Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville |
| 09a0054n.06 | USA v. Ricardo Cornejo Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids |
Hey gorgeous, great vids. Are the coil wires coeppr? Silly question I know, but at present I do not even own a screwdriver, so am delighted to be revisiting my school days with lots more success, thanks to you! The wires for the actual circuit are also of what metal. See, it is a really long time since I was a school girl! Cheers
Posted by: Jeni | July 04, 2012 at 05:14 AM